lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <200408150041.08498.fulldisc@ultratux.org> From: fulldisc at ultratux.org (Maarten) Subject: meta-question about the list Hi list, I noticed that this list (-software) unlike many others does not add a "Reply-To: field with the list address there. This makes replying a wee bit more error-prone since a lot of MUA's will happily reply to the poster instead of the list unless you manually cut&paste the right addresses. Is there a special reason this header isn't used ? Maarten -- Yes of course I'm sure it's the red cable. I guarante[^%!/+)F#0c|'NO CARRIER