[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200408181638.i7IGcG313701@pop-5.dnv.wideopenwest.com>
From: mvp at joeware.net (joe)
Subject: RE: MS should re-write code with security in mind. lame bitching about xpsp2
I think you meant your first line to be
"All OS vendors should bite the bullet and re-write their code with security
in mind."
Not sure why you singled MS out for that statement. Especially considering
the rest of the post.
joe
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Clairmont, Jan
M
Sent: Wednesday, August 18, 2004 11:52 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: [Full-Disclosure] RE: [Full-Disclosure]MS should re-write code with
security in mind. lame bitching about xpsp2
M$ should just bite the bullet and re-write windows with security in mind,
give it a true process scheduler, multiuser
with windows as a client server processes. Build in 256 bit encryption and
secure communications between processes and external communication with no
unencrypted traffic. That would shut down a lot of these mindless bugs.
All mail should be encrypted and point-to-point, with the mail servers only
able to re-direct and broadcast mail with authentication. Maybe we could
slow a lot of the hacking down and spam. But again until the market place
demands it M$, Linux and everybody else it's business as usual.
Keeps us employed I guess.
Jan Clairmont
Firewall Administrator/Consultant
Powered by blists - more mailing lists