lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1093022099.32071.19.camel@puffin.tamucc.edu>
From: michael at puffin.tamucc.edu (Michael Williamson)
Subject: Electronic Voting Machines - WinVote by
	Adv anced Voting Solutions

These power ranges are perfectly legal in (some of) the amateur radio
bands.  The 2.4 ghz ISM band partially overlaps the 2.4 ghz amateur
band.  Dangerous?  Very.  One use: Moonbounce communications.   I've
heard of people running 1.5kw into very high gain antenna arrays
producing ERP's in the 1/4 megawatt range for moonbounce.  This is still
perfectly legal.  (but using it as a weapon isn't) Now pointing the
thing around and intentionally blowing the front end off of everything
somewhat resonant (and popping eyeballs) with it would be illegal, but
I'm only discussing incidental interference. 

-Michael

On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 07:50, James Tucker wrote:
> Of course the power ranges you quote are also illegal, not to mention
> extremely dangerous.
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040820/80ff8ab1/attachment.bin

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ