full-disclosure - Unsecure file permission of ZoneAlarm pro.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.61.0408201349260.24201@pbaprcg>
From: sbirl at temple.edu (Birl)
Subject: Unsecure file permission of ZoneAlarm pro.

On Aug 20, bipin gautam (nospam-visitbipin@...oo.com.ns) typed:

bipin:  > On Friday 20 August 2004 12:40, John LaCour wrote:
bipin:  > > There is absolutely no security issue here.
bipin:  > >
bipin:  > > ZoneAlarm does not rely on file permissions to protect
bipin:  > > any configuration files.   Configuration files are protected
bipin:  > > by our TrueVector(r) driver in the kernel.
bipin:  >
bipin:  > Which is, of course, completely utterly infallible
bipin:  > so any additional means are
bipin:  > not only unneccessary, but even unwanted.
bipin:
bipin:  In my part of globe, 90% of dialup users just turn on
bipin:  zone alarm pro. JUST before connecting to the
bipin:  internet... cauz its too annoying cauz zap pop's up
bipin:  with bla...bla...bla quit often and use resources
bipin:  etc...
bipin:
bipin:  bipin

Aye.  ZA Pro does consume quite a bit of the CPU at times.
Im consdering a hardware fw just for that reason.

There are other things about logging that concern me as well.
But that's different topic.

 Scott Birl                              http://concept.temple.edu/sysadmin/
 Senior Systems Administrator            Computer Services   Temple University
====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====+====*====*====*====*====*====*====*====*