[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E97F0997FB84D42B221B9FB203EFA2707E57F@dc1ms2.msad.brookshires.net>
From: toddtowles at brookshires.com (Todd Towles)
Subject: !SPAM! Automated ssh scanning
The kernel could be save. But with weak passwords, you are toast. Any
automated tool would test guest/guest.
-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Richard
Verwayen
Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 6:08 AM
To: 'FD'
Subject: RE: !SPAM! [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning
On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 11:47, Yaakov Yehudi wrote:
> In spite of many reports to the contrary, Linux is _not_ secure by
default.
> Did you harden it? There is a lot of documentation on the web as to
> how to go about it.
>
> YY
Hello Yaakov,
This system was a pure debian woody none-production one with all
services disabled - just ssh was left open in order to see for what
purpose the scan was! Yes, there was a guest account with a weak
passwort (guest) on it!
And yes, they logged in and became root in no time. But I thought the
kernel compiled from the latest debian woody kernel-source could be
considered to be save. But I was wrong! So I posted the tools used by
the attackers to this list and also to the debian security team.
Richard
_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists