full-disclosure - !SPAM! Automated ssh scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.4.43.0408260942060.27378-100000@tundra.winternet.com>
From: dufresne at winternet.com (Ron DuFresne)
Subject: !SPAM! Automated ssh scanning

On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Richard Verwayen wrote:

> On Thu, 2004-08-26 at 15:12, Todd Towles wrote:
> >  The kernel could be save. But with weak passwords, you are toast. Any
> > automated tool would test guest/guest.
> >
> Hello Todd!
>
> You are right about the passwords, but guest is only a unprivileged
> account as you may have on many prodruction machines. But they managed
> to become root on this machine due to a kernel(?) exploit!
> Should I then consider any woody system to be insecure to let people
> work at?

If your uasers are not trustable, then they should not have access to
local systems of yours.  Once a person has a shell, then they are 95% to
root.

Thanks,

Ron DuFresne
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***

OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.