full-disclosure - Automated ssh scanning

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <412E31ED.3090107@secnetops.com>
From: kf_lists at secnetops.com (KF_lists)
Subject: Automated ssh scanning

Will *ANYONE* that actually got hacked do me a favor and type:
"uname -a"
Then include that in your next email. I keep hearing "fully patched" 
server however I have a feeling the Kernel was left out of the patching.

-KF


Todd Towles wrote:
> Hey Ron,
> 
> Guest isn't a admin so they let the tool get in. But the real questions
> is, how does it get root access on a fully patched server? It appears to
> use a local exploit to gain root access. This is a problem.  
> 
> Sorry about the eariler e-mail, I haven't had my coffee today. Trying to
> cut back and spend that money on IT security =P
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
> [mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Ron
> DuFresne
> Sent: Thursday, August 26, 2004 9:08 AM
> To: Tig
> Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Automated ssh scanning
> 
> 
> 
> the real thing this user most likely suffered from was the weak account
> passwd double, guest:guest.  Now, if the admin and other account were
> setup with strong passwd's and this account was either setup with a
> strong passwd or not setup at all might be a better test of the
> stability of ssh and the debain setup in question.
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ron DuFresne
> 
> On Thu, 26 Aug 2004, Tig wrote:
> 
> 
>>On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 19:43:47 -0400
>>Gerry Eisenhaur <GEisenhaur@...co.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>I am confused, you said you knew about some SSH scanning going on, 
>>>then set up those accounts on a box. Now you are curious way that 
>>>box got rooted?
>>>
>>>Maybe I am missing something, but it seems you already have a pretty
> 
> 
>>>good assumption of why it got rooted.
>>>
>>>The software, as you seem to know, is a few exploits, a backdoor and
> 
> 
>>>some IRC stuff(bot and proxy).
>>>
>>>/gerry
>>>
>>
>>I think you did miss the point (which was a very good one). Basically,
> 
> 
>>once you have unprivileged access to a currently patched Woody box, 
>>you can quickly gain root access.
>>
>>I would love to see this tested against other version of Linux and 
>>*BSD with default (and updated) installations. Anyone have a spare box
> 
> 
>>and a few hours?
>>
>>-Tig
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>
> 
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> "Cutting the space budget really restores my faith in humanity.  It
> eliminates dreams, goals, and ideals and lets us get straight to the
> business of hate, debauchery, and self-annihilation." -- Johnny Hart
> 	***testing, only testing, and damn good at it too!***
> 
> OK, so you're a Ph.D.  Just don't touch anything.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>