lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <413EA026.4020909@rogers.com>
From: blsonne at rogers.com (Byron L. Sonne)
Subject: Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.

 > That depends how you define sentience, but yes, humans often exhibit
 > more, but only where they know to do so. The same is true of a well
 > designed computer program.

Ah, no.

Computer programs (well designed or otherwise) are not, and have never 
been, sentient.  I'll go so far as to state that computer programs are 
fully incapable of ever being sentient(1).

I'm just waiting for all the cheesy AI fanboys to start yelling at me 
now, but then again, they'd probably be the same kind of clowns that 
think passing the Turing Test would mean possessing intelligence(2). 
Shit man, there's been mornings where I'd probably fail the Turing Test ;)

Regards,
Byron

 (1) Sentient \Sen"ti*ent\, a. [L. sentiens, -entis, p. pr. of
     sentire to discern or perceive by the senses. See {Sense}.]
     Having a faculty, or faculties, of sensation and perception.

 (2) Intelligence \In*tel"li*gence\, n. [F. intelligence, L.
     intelligentia, intellegentia. See {Intelligent}.]
     1. The act or state of knowing; the exercise of the
        understanding.




Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ