[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <413EA026.4020909@rogers.com>
From: blsonne at rogers.com (Byron L. Sonne)
Subject: Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
> That depends how you define sentience, but yes, humans often exhibit
> more, but only where they know to do so. The same is true of a well
> designed computer program.
Ah, no.
Computer programs (well designed or otherwise) are not, and have never
been, sentient. I'll go so far as to state that computer programs are
fully incapable of ever being sentient(1).
I'm just waiting for all the cheesy AI fanboys to start yelling at me
now, but then again, they'd probably be the same kind of clowns that
think passing the Turing Test would mean possessing intelligence(2).
Shit man, there's been mornings where I'd probably fail the Turing Test ;)
Regards,
Byron
(1) Sentient \Sen"ti*ent\, a. [L. sentiens, -entis, p. pr. of
sentire to discern or perceive by the senses. See {Sense}.]
Having a faculty, or faculties, of sensation and perception.
(2) Intelligence \In*tel"li*gence\, n. [F. intelligence, L.
intelligentia, intellegentia. See {Intelligent}.]
1. The act or state of knowing; the exercise of the
understanding.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists