[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: Dave.Ewart at cancer.org.uk (Dave Ewart)
Subject: Re: Re: open telnet port
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, 09.09.2004 at 08:13 +0200, list@...og.org wrote:
> Steve Kudlak wrote:
> >I'll ask my friend what he does as the "just don't do x" or just get
> >rid of x never seems like a good idea. If you try to connect with
> >telnet rather than ssh to that box it just doesn't go through.
>
> getting rid of telnetd is almost always a very good idea.
Quite so, as I suggested.
Are there even any legitimate uses for running a telnet daemon any more?
(That is a genuine question - as far as I can see, SSH is always a
perfect replacement).
Dave.
- --
Dave Ewart
Dave.Ewart@...cer.org.uk
Computing Manager, Epidemiology Unit, Oxford
Cancer Research UK
PGP: CC70 1883 BD92 E665 B840 118B 6E94 2CFD 694D E370
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBQBL8bpQs/WlN43ARAr0TAJ9N340MHUdsbQV3iiW2rD4sXWNjEwCg4/wm
yh0Fe7/G58Dgu+pKoSJAtGM=
=hCDd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Powered by blists - more mailing lists