[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20040910071019.GC15077@DAPCVA.da>
From: varcher at denyall.com (Vincent Archer)
Subject: Re: Empirical data surrounding guards and firewalls.
On Thu, Sep 09, 2004 at 02:41:26PM -0600, gadgeteer@...gantinnovations.org wrote:
> Given Moore's Law and the other rules of thumb regarding the progress of
> computer hardware it will be another 25 to 30 years before we match
> human capacity.
>
> Anyone who says they can achieve such in significantly less time is
> seeking funding. :-)
Or is using the relatively simple reasoning that brains are full of
cruft, overcapacity, and other elements that are not specifically
required for sentience, but devoted to the management of a primate's
body, and we can do a better job.
Emulating a human is very very different from making a sentience. That's
the main flaw of the Turing's test: it attempts to prove the existence
of human-type sentience, not sentience in general.
--
Vincent ARCHER
varcher@...yall.com
Tel : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 14
Fax : +33 (0)1 40 07 47 27
Deny All - 5, rue Scribe - 75009 Paris - France
www.denyall.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists