| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51656.216.99.185.50.1095899497.squirrel@216.99.185.50> From: mlist at iwasdot.com (Mailing Lists) Subject: MS04-028 Shell Exploit Does anyone know the order of displaying images and saving them to cache? I tested the cmd.exe jpg and it is detected by McAfee as Exploit MS04-028. So does internet explorer write the image to cache first before it displays it or does it display the image then write it to cache. I don't have a machine with web server installed where I could test this at the moment. My concern is that internet explorer will open the file and execute the exploit before the code hits the hard disk. We will know that a machine has been expoited but that may be to late. Thanks > Well, on my WinXP SP1 machine, the shellcode will not excecute when > displayed in a web browser (firefox PR1 and IE 6 SP1). > It will however excecute when windows opens the folder that it's in > (trying to make a thumbnail i would assume.) A few seconds after the > command window opens, explorer crashes. > (un)Fortunately none of the email accounts that I had up and running let > the attatchment through... they thought it was Bloodhound.Exploit.13. > I didn't have enough time to try anything fancy immediately before i > left work so I left it at that. I wonder if this could potentially turn > into an email worm. > > -andy > > Todd Towles wrote: > >>MS04-028 Exploit >> >>Launches local cmd.exe (not port bound) >> >>http://www.k-otik.com/exploits/09222004.ms04-28-cmd.c.php >> >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com >>[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Josh L. >>Perrymon >>Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2004 1:48 PM >>To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com >>Subject: [Full-Disclosure] New GDI exploit >> >>Game over... >> >>So the exploit is out that will open a local command prompt on the >>machine exploiting the GDI library.. >> >>This thing allows 2500 bytes of shellcode.. >> >>How long before this turns nasty? >> >>Seems easy to me to make it reverse shell... >> >> >>-------- >> >>The problem I have is patching with SMS. MBSA won't pickup the needed >>patched in SMS so you have to push out to all machines in a container >>for a certain software type- >> >>IE >>XP >>VIsio >> >> >>blah blah so on.... >> >>------------ >> >>The cycle continues.. >> >>JP >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. >>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html >> >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html > >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists