full-disclosure - Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: mvp at joeware.net (joe)
Subject: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

There were actually worse foul ups from poor developers using that function.
And I agree, the ones who did it weren't too intelligent or informed on what
they were dealing with. Doesn't mean that windows is a product of stupid
developers but parts of it could certainly be pointed at as an argument for
it. :o)  

  joe

-----Original Message-----
From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com
[mailto:full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com] On Behalf Of Frank Knobbe
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 10:09 AM
To: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 06:21, ASB wrote:
> That has nothing to do with Windows, and everything to do with a 
> stupid application.
> 
> ...as if stupid app developers are solely the products of Windows
environments.

No. But according to that logic it seems that Windows is a product of stupid
developers.

http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=http://support.microsoft.com:
80/support/kb/articles/q216/6/41.asp&NoWebContent=1