full-disclosure - Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <200409242014.i8OKErx15611@pop-6.dnv.wideopenwest.com>
From: mvp at joeware.net (joe)
Subject: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

You certainly like to assume. 

MS being aware doesn't mean they are involved. Even if they are, I suspect
they will not go around saying that the vendor screwed up. They will simply
help them with it. On a daily basis MS sends people into companies and
corrects and troubleshoots things vendors did incorrectly. I have friends in
MCS and that is pretty much all they do day in and day out, correct what
partners and vendors made mistakes on in customer sites. The
vendors/partners tend to be pissy about it but not quite as pissy if MS went
around telling everyone publicly whose stuff they had to throw out and redo.

On the MS puppet piece, you once again have no clue of what you speak. 

  joe 

-----Original Message-----
From: Georgi Guninski [mailto:guninski@...inski.com] 
Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 3:58 PM
To: joe
Cc: full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

joo,

i don't want to read shit written by m$ puppets.

clearly m$ is involved in this incident according to the press.

enough days passed since the "incident" (hahahahaha).

where is the oficial m$ reply?

--
where do you want bill gates to go today?