full-disclosure - Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1096059735.554.123.camel@localhost>
From: frank at knobbe.us (Frank Knobbe)
Subject: Windoze almost managed to 200x repeat 9/11

On Fri, 2004-09-24 at 15:55, Ron DuFresne wrote:
> > Who do we
> > blame? Operators or products?
> 
> or vendors.  you forgot vendors Frank! <gryn>.  vendors drive how other
> apps are produced for the environment, which drives how technical folks
> deal with them...

Heya Ron,

yeah, you're right. But we have to better specify "vendor". For one
there are the manufacturer of products. Then there are the resellers and
consultants that introduce products into organizations. It sounds like
you are referring to the later part.

I think operators/employees and reseller/consultants do feel heat when
products fails (employees being shafted/fired and resellers/consultants
being "not called back" and losing contracts). I think we need to put
more emphasis/heat/blame on the manufacturer.

Cheers,
Frank
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040924/1fe6ee33/attachment.bin