[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <415985C2.7080005@sbcglobal.net>
From: chromazine at sbcglobal.net (Steve Kudlak)
Subject: JPEG Virus
Well I am always careful with what comes with this list. Pretty much
anything
that has come so far hasn't been "spring loaded". But if one is a "duh,
uh I just
click on anything in front of me..." I mean teenaged friends kind of
think I am
being a snarly old dude because I want them to label their cute little
multiattachment
letters of kitty cat pictures with something. I do worry about that
problem...target
something at a community, make it look like standard stuff that gets
passed around
in that community and that would be a good way tp start spreading stuff.
Have Fun,
Sends Steve
Have Fun,
Sends Steve
Dave Horsfall wrote:
>On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Dave Horsfall wrote:
>
>
>
>>On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Joel R. Helgeson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>The attached file IS INFECTED with the new JPEG virus... Or rather, it
>>>has the malicious image that will then infect your machine.
>>>
>>>
>>Odd; it didn't seem to work on any of my *BSD boxes. XV complains about
>>extraneous bytes and the quantizatiion (sic) table.
>>
>>Oh well; it looks like we *BSD users are safe from this one :-)
>>
>>
>
>Hmmm... Not a bad night's fishing. Two personal replies in my mailbox,
>from a couple of lusers who obviously missed the difference between the
>above declaration "will then infect your machine" with the obvious
>correction of "will then infect your WINDOZE machine."
>
>-- Dave
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20040928/b00ecd55/attachment.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists