full-disclosure - Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <addc34c60410121715606dbecc@mail.gmail.com>
From: nocmonkey at gmail.com (Danny)
Subject: Microsoft Security Bulletin Summary for October, 2004

On Tue, 12 Oct 2004 19:27:42 -0400, d31337 <d31337@...il.com> wrote:
> I should have been more specific to eliminate confusion for those who
> consider IE part of the OS.
> 
> Revised comment:
> Interesting that XP SP2 doesn't seem to be impacted by any of the
> *Windows*  (not IE) vulnerabilities...

I see your point, however, I would say IE is more a part of Windows
than any other component.

Now, back to your theme, yes, I also agree that Windows XP SP2 was
less affected by these vulns than any other version of Windows. I
would like to tell Microsoft, this is the way it *should* be!

...D