lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: rivgi at finjan.com (Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

And whom do you think found those holes...  :-)
Its all my work, and there is plenty more at MS...just unpublished...and more comng for SP1 too...
You will see...


Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider
Security Consultant 
Malicious Code Research Center (MCRC)
Finjan Software LTD
E-mail: rivgi@...jan.com
---------------------------------
Prevention is the best cure!


From: Todd Towles (toddtowlesbrookshires.com)
Date: Fri Nov 12 2004 - 14:58:56 CST 

  a.. Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] 

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I don't know about you Rafel, but I know people in your company think XP 
SP2 is full of holes also. =) 


"Ten new security holes in Windows XP Service Pack 2 have been 
discovered, so get ready to insert new patches into your patch 
management schedule. Microsoft recently announced their Security 
Bulletin Advance Notification Program, which gives administrators a 
several days advance notice of upcoming patches, however these new 
security holes were announced by security product maker Finjan 
Software." 


http://www.winnetmag.com/Windows/Article/ArticleID/44502/Windows_44502.h 
tml 


Great ten more patches they won't released for Windows XP Gold or 
Windows 2000.... 


I think the founder of Finjan is speaking my language as well... 


Shlomo Touboul, CEO and Founder of Finjan Software, said "Windows XP SP2 
operating system is a continuation of the same Windows XP Operating 
System and Windows Kernel. All Windows versions have been developed with 
requirements for highest backward compatibility and open architecture, 
with maximum productivity and ease of use. In addition, Windows 
applications typically run with administrative permission with full and 
unlimited access to computer resources." 


Sound familiar? 


-Todd 


> Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider 
> Security Consultant 
> Malicious Code Research Center (MCRC) 
> Finjan Software LTD 
> E-mail: rivgiFinjan.com 
> --------------------------------- 
> Prevention is the best cure! 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <Colin.Scottcsplc.com> 
> To: <full-disclosurelists.netsys.com> 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 12:46 PM 
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox 
> 
> 
> Oh yeah, I've got 14,000 Windows 2000 machines to update to 
> windows XP SP2, 
> hang on wheres that CD? 
> 
> So thanks for your infinate wisdom there Rafel. 
> 
> Colin. 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> "Rafel Ivgi, 
> The-Insider" 
> <theinsider012.n To 
> et.il> <full-disclosurelists.netsys.com> 
> Sent by: cc 
> full-disclosure-a 
> dminlists.netsys Subject 
> .com Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as 
> safe as FireFox 
> 12/11/2004 06:44 
> 
> 
> 
> That is incorrect, there is a fix --> SP2. 
> Users should use the latest updated system, meaning if there 
> is an SP2, 
> they 
> should install it. 
> 
> 
> Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider 
> Security Consultant 
> Malicious Code Research Center (MCRC) 
> Finjan Software LTD 
> E-mail: rivgiFinjan.com 
> --------------------------------- 
> Prevention is the best cure! 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Martin Mkrtchian" <dotsecuregmail.com> 
> To: "Todd Towles" <toddtowlesbrookshires.com> 
> Cc: "Mailing List - Full-Disclosure" 
> <full-disclosurelists.netsys.com>; 
> <ring-of-fireyahoogroups.com> 
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:03 AM 
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox 
> 
> 
> > They should've at least released that statement after they 
> fixed the 
> > IE FRAME vulnerability. 0 day exploit is in the wild and no fix for 
> > it, yet they claim its secure enough. 
> > 
> > If the programmers are as smart as the company press 
> releasers, I can 
> > see why I.E. still sux. 
> > 
> > 
> > Martin 
> > 
> > 
> > On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:59:20 -0600, Todd Towles 
> > <toddtowlesbrookshires.com> wrote: 
> >> Microsoft's security and mangement product manager (Ben English) 
> says... 
> >> 
> >> At a security roundtable discussion in Sydney on 
> Thursday, Ben English, 
> >> Microsoft's security and management product manager, told 
> attendees 
> that 
> >> IE undergoes "rigorous code reviews" and is no less 
> secure than any 
> >> other browser. 
> >> 
> >> "Because IE is ubiquitous, you hear a lot more about it, 
> but I don't 
> >> think that Internet Explorer is any less secure than any 
> other browser 
> >> out there," English said. 
> >> 
> >> 
> http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/ 
> 2100-1032_ 
> >> 3-5448719.html?part=dht&tag=ntop&tag=nl.e433 
> >> 
> >> Can anyone say IFRAME? Lol 
> >> 
> >> -Todd 
> >> 
> >> _______________________________________________ 
> >> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. 
> >> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html 
> >> 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________ 
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. 
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ************************************************************** 
> ************************ 
> 
> This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged 
> information. If you 
> are not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in 
> error, it may 
> be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or 
> otherwise use the 
> information which it contains. Under these circumstances, 
> please notify 
> us immediately by returning this mail to 
> 'mailerrorcsplc.com' and deleting 
> this e-mail from your system. 
> 
> Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do 
> not necessarily 
> reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its 
> subsidiaries. Cadbury 
> Schweppes Plc will not be bound by any agreement entered into 
> as a result 
> of this email, unless its intention is clearly evidenced in 
> the body of the 
> email. 
> Whilst we have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and 
> attachments are free from viruses, recipients are advised to 
> subject this 
> mail 
> to their own virus checking, in keeping with good computing 
> practice. Please 
> note that email received by Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its 
> subsidiaries may be 
> monitored in accordance with the prevailing law in the United Kingdom. 
> 
> ************************************************************** 
> ************************ 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. 
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html 
> 
> _______________________________________________ 
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. 
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html 
> 


_______________________________________________ 
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it. 
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html 

-----------------------------------------------
This message was scanned for malicious content and viruses by Finjan Internet Vital Security 1Box(tm)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041014/300c3e87/attachment.html
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 84 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041014/300c3e87/attachment.gif

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ