[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410171116010.7213@gandalf.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
From: hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org (Hugo van der Kooij)
Subject: [SPAM] Re: [SPAM] Your daily internet traffic
report
On Sat, 16 Oct 2004 lee.e.rian@...sus.gov wrote:
> > > Most routers will regard any ICMP request to them as a low priority
> issue.
> >
> > do they? icmp is not only about 'echo'. there's lot of
> > other functions via type/code - fragmentation, mtu etc,
> > vital for traffic signalization. administrators, who
> > blindly closes all icmp traffic are plain stupid idiots.
>
> Lots 'o flame but no light.
>
> How about sharing your knowledge of why certain icmp traffic should be
> allowed and the risks associated with allowing that traffic?
Just to name one: Path MTU discovery (RFC 1191)
This memo describes a technique for dynamically discovering the
maximum transmission unit (MTU) of an arbitrary internet path. It
specifies a small change to the way routers generate one type of ICMP
message.
Hugo.
--
I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
hvdkooij@...derkooij.org http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
for they are subtle and quick to anger.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists