[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <003801c4b535$02355400$7942100a@mother>
From: yossarian at planet.nl (yossarian)
Subject: Full-Disclosure Posts
You actually CAN criticize bad decisions, but for that you have to be:
A) an expensive consultant from a major firm (e.g. good avice = expensive,
i.e. expensive advice = good!)
B) adressing the right audience in the organisation. Rule of thumb: the
higher your audience is in the hierarchy, the more they expect you to slam
them. Maybe it is a coincidence, but apparantly managers are much more into
SM than sysadmins.....
----- Original Message -----
From: "xploitable" <xploitable@...il.com>
To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
Sent: Monday, October 18, 2004 9:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] Full-Disclosure Posts
> On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 01:09:09 +0200, yossarian
<yossarian@...net.nl> wrote:<BR>
> > But Dear Backyard - have you applied for a job at yahoo as a
security pro?<BR>
> > Apparantly you know what they should know and you are willing to
tell<BR>
> > them.... If not - give it a try.<BR>
> <BR>
> No sorry, i'm one of these underground nerd / geeks or whatever
label<BR>
> one stamps on such people.<BR>
> <BR>
> I might annoy them for a job one day, for now i'm happy being a pro<BR>
> activist via e-mail. I can do more for Yahoo! by not working for
them.<BR>
> If you work for someone you can't speak out and criticize bad<BR>
> decisions.<BR>
> <BR>
> My heart is with Yahoo!, I grew up with Yahoo! and will continue to<BR>
> assist them when some incident arrises from within the underground<BR>
> paternity, even if I do backstab them from time to time.<BR>
> <BR>
> _______________________________________________<BR>
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.<BR>
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists