| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1098256953.17299.19.camel@je.nets.com> From: hackerwacker at cybermesa.com (James Edwards) Subject: Windows Time Synchronization - Best Practices On Tue, 2004-10-19 at 11:22, Richard Stevens wrote: > Why FD? What is the direct security implications of this? > > I'm sure someone can construct a rather tenuous link, but really.... All forensics requires a time line or time reference so the separate pieces of forensic data can be assembled in the order they happened. Otherwise, each data point cannot be related to the others. Data is often gathered from multiple devices. Security and time are very much related. I would suggest NTP and using GMT. -- James H. Edwards Routing and Security Administrator At the Santa Fe Office: Internet at Cyber Mesa jamesh@...ermesa.com noc@...ermesa.com (505) 795-7101 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041020/59d2e995/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists