full-disclosure - [in] Re: Will a vote for John Kerry be counted by a Hart InterCivic eSlate3000 in Honolulu?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <417923CC.4040404@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (Barry Fitzgerald)
Subject: [in] Re: Will a vote for John Kerry be counted
 by a Hart InterCivic eSlate3000 in Honolulu?

Exibar wrote:

>Curt,
>    And what was it that Bush lied to you personally about?  or lied to the
>American People about?  WMD's in Iraq? Just because we haven't found many of
>them (YES we have found some, BTW), doesn't mean they didn't exist....
>Like life on Mars, just because we haven't seem little green men yet,
>doesn't mean they don't exist.
>  
>
Let's see...

Donald Rumsfeld:  "We know where they are.  They're in the area around 
Tikrit and Baghdad.  We know exactly where they are."
How about Colin Powell using biological warfare agent figures from 1991, 
claiming to the UN that Hussein had the exact same figures, when he 
later admitted that he knew that those levels had been destroyed?
How about the Nigerian yellowcake incident?

Do I need to go on with the lies or is enlightenment finding you now?

Britain has WMDs.  So does Israel.  So does Pakistan.  Is having WMDs a 
justification for invasion?  How about intent?  How far do we have to 
justify their intent?  Are these questions that you'll actually think 
about and answer?  Probably not.

>   Did you vote for Clinton?  Now HE out right lied to the American people,
>UNDER OATH no less....   Kerry has also lied, out and out.... the first lie
>that comes to mind is the thought that he threw his medals over the fence
>after Viet-nam, he still has HIS medals.  He's trying to say that he "threw
>medals" not that he "threw HIS medals".  Oh and what's that, first he was
>for the war that he served in, then against, and now all of a sudden he's
>running for president and he's for it again.   iraq the same way, he's
>against it, he's for it, he's against it... he's a friggin revolving door.
>
>  
>
When Clinton lied, no one died.  What did happen, though, is that 
congress spent millions of dollars investigating Clinton's zipper and 
took FBI agents off of Al Quaeda.  Thank you republican Senate.

Oh, and Bush is such a solid leader... he never flip flops...

Unless you're talking about gay marriage (states rights... no wait, it's 
a federal thing), the war on terror (it can be won; it can't be won; it 
can be won), the economy (the president influences the economy - 
therefore Clinton did this, the president has nothing to do with it - 
not Bush's fault), etc...etc...etc...

Yeah, thank the heavens that Bush isn't a flip flopper on anything... 
well, except for everything, that is.

             -Barry