full-disclosure - Q: Linux Command Line Encryption

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d43c8d1b0410221144540c38c3@mail.gmail.com>
From: michael4447 at gmail.com (Michael Rutledge)
Subject: Q: Linux Command Line Encryption

Check out the crypt tool.  Do a "man crypt" to see the options.  Crypt
should be included with any distribution of Linux (also on Solaris).

-Michael

On Fri, 22 Oct 2004 13:46:08 -0400, Mike Tancsa <mike@...tex.net> wrote:
> At 01:48 PM 22/10/2004, Ali Campbell wrote:
> >I need a Linux utility which I can use to encrypt a single gzipped file
> >via the command line. Obviously something open source would be preferable.
> >I'm not really interested in setting up a whole suite of stuff with
> >keyfiles and so on, and I don't need a public/private key setup, just
> >something quick and dirty with a single secret key for encryption and
> >decryption which is nevertheless reasonably strong.
> 
> Whats wrong with openssl ?
> 
> openssl des3 -in test.txt -out test.txt.enc
> 
> or
> 
> openssl aes-256-cbc -in test.txt -out test.txt.enc
> 
> This is only as strong as your passphrase.  Using something like GPG has
> other advantages since the private key can be kept in a separate location
> from the encrypted file.
> 
> 
>          ---Mike 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>