[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041023130558.W12015@ubzr.zsa.bet>
From: measl at mfn.org (J.A. Terranson)
Subject: Windows 2000 Remote Buffer Overflow by class101
On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Danny wrote:
> > "Stack based overflow, bug discovered by Luigi Auriemma
> > aluigi.altervista.org
> > Tested working on Win2K, This public version crash on any WinXP, read
> > the code why.
> > The exploit bind a shellcode on the victim port 101."
>
> What does Microsoft say in response?
In a news conference where Mr. Bill was approached with this very
question, he is reported to have stated that "The Windows Operating System
is the most secure piece of crap, er, um, code ever written. Micro$loth
emphatically denies that this is anything but the most minor of issues,
and doesn't even rise to the level of threat necessary to achieve public
commentary. Therefore, Micro$loth has no comment. Thank you, and good
night.".
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
sysadmin@....org
0xBD4A95BF
"An ill wind is stalking
while evil stars whir
and all the gold apples
go bad to the core"
S. Plath, Temper of Time
Powered by blists - more mailing lists