full-disclosure - Re: getting administrator rights on win2003 machine?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41817547.30701@psilanthropy.org>
From: hades at psilanthropy.org (Anders Langworthy)
Subject: Re: getting administrator rights on win2003
 machine?

> Somehow, I get the feeling that the original poster's site will discover
> KVM switches around 2008 or so. ;)

That's exactly my point.  I don't necessarily approve of this list being 
used to help clueless script kiddies r00t systems, but the information 
needed to accomplish that feat is *identical* to the the information 
needed by clueless sysadmins to prevent against it.

What if I had been the original poster, and had phrased my question from 
the standpoint of a system administrator requesting help in hardening a 
Windows 2003 server that has to be physically accessible?  Would you 
have "seen through my ploy" and not helped me?

This list is about helping people who are interested in computer 
security get *better* at computer security.  I don't see how we can 
maintain that double standard without causing more harm than good.