[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <41821B1E.1010108@xmcopartners.com>
From: thierry.haven at xmcopartners.com (Thierry Haven)
Subject: Hackers of [xpire.info] use an unknown Apache
1.3.27 exploit???
Hi,
It appears that the signature is
00000000 C6C22C mov dl, 2C
00000003 37 aaa
00000004 60 pushad
00000005 C1EFD4 shr edi, D4
00000008 C4922264C66A les edx, dword ptr [edx+6AC66422]
0000000E E10D loopz 0000001D
00000010 8A6A5F mov ch, byte ptr [edx+5F]
00000013 D44E aam (base78)
00000015 91 xchg eax,ecx
00000016 10044D00000000 adc byte ptr [2*ecx+104D044D], al
The beginning & the end of the disassembly may be wrong if the signature
is not complete. However it doesn't make much sense globally and this
code is too short to see a potential attack : no memory is written here.
By the way, where is this signature from ?
_______________________________________
Thierry Haven - Xmco Partners
Consultant S?curit? / Test d'intrusion
tel : 33 1 53 45 28 63
web : http://www.xmcopartners.com
16 place Vendome 75001 PARIS
Elia Florio wrote:
>Hi list,
>I'm fighting again against an hackers crew
>(I suppose the same mentioned in this link:
>http://seclists.org/lists/incidents/2004/Jul/0056.html )
>which is installing various malware on many
>compromised box to get group of zombies ready-to-run.
>(follow my previous mail on "xpire.info" and "splitinfinity.info")
>
>I've found in some logs that they use different exploits on port 80
>but one exploit is specific for Apache 1.3.27 (with PHP/Perl
>and other module installed).
>
>It looks like an overflow, I know that 1.3.27 is a bugged version,
>but I would to know if anyone have seen this code before:
>Extracted from error log of Apache :
>
>216.40.203.9 - - [28/Oct/2004:10:54:37 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_xd8(xcbtxa6xba"
>400 299
>
>140.105.55.159 - - [08/Oct/2004:15:55:35 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_x8ci7x9fx8cxec" 400
>-
>
>195.140.140.122 - - [11/Oct/2004:03:58:05 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_xc3x8cx8czxcfx19"
>400 -
>
>212.78.145.16 - - [13/Oct/2004:20:48:23 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_xd4Nx91x10x04M" 400
>-
>
>65.125.235.250 - - [28/Oct/2004:09:55:02 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_A}xebxfax8axe5"
>400 - "-" "-"
>
>65.125.235.250 - - [28/Oct/2004:09:55:58 +0200]
>"xc6xc2,7`xc1xefxd4$xc4x92"dxc6jxe1rx8aj_A}xebxfax8axe8"
>400 - "-" "-"
>
>I would suggest to any sysadmin using Apache 1.3.27 to ban this subnet
>from their hosts, cause all attacks are coming from these machines :
>
>216.40.203.*,
>140.105.55.*,
>195.140.140.*,
>212.78.145.*,
>65.125.235.*
>(...and obvious "xpire.info")
>
>Someone suggests to me that they are related to :
>
>Qwest Communications NET-QWEST-BLKS-4 (NET-65-112-0-0-1)
>65.112.0.0 - 65.127.255.255
>EZZI.NET Q0625-65-125-224-0 (NET-65-125-224-0-1)
>65.125.224.0 - 65.125.239.255
>
>The exploits left this signatures (i have to translate the opcodes into asm)
>:
>
>xC6 xC2 x2C x37 x60 xC1 xEF xD4 xC4 x92 x22 x64 xC6 x6A xE1 x0D x8A
>x6A x5F xD4 x4E x91 x10 x04 4D
>
>The last bytes are changing in every attempt, so this seems to be a
>bruteforce attempt to get a valid return address to execute the exploit.
>
>Probably the exploit works for a specific version of Apache/Linux Kernel,
>so the hacker have to try many times with different ret. address to
>find the right way to execute it.
>
>Any comments?
>
>EF
>
>________________________________________________
>Messaggio inviato da
>Edizioni Master Webmail
>http://mbox.edmaster.it
>
>_______________________________________________
>Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>
>
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists