full-disclosure - [SPAM] Fw: Joke.cpl ???

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0410291449270.21040@gandalf.hugo.vanderkooij.org>
From: hvdkooij at vanderkooij.org (Hugo van der Kooij)
Subject: [SPAM] Fw: Joke.cpl ???

On Fri, 29 Oct 2004, Daniel Bachfeld wrote:

> So far we have Bagle AQ, AT, AU, AY and BB for the same worm
> More proposals?
>
> This is the biggest divergence i've seen the last months. Is there any
> reason, why the vendors could not agree on one name? We already have
> CVE-entries and Bugtraq-IDs for vulnerabilities.

So far I noticed at least two distinct files which were detected as
W32/Bable.AP@mm (F-Prot) or Worm.Bagle.AT (ClamAV).

Now I get freash trash Which is decoded as W32/Bagle.AQ@mm (F-Prot) or
Worm.Bagle.AX (ClamAV).

I am under the impression it is not a single infection.

But I share your sense of utter confusion. To which the people of ClamAV
have contributed way too much. (Noticed their 'SomeFool'series?)

Hugo.

-- 
	I hate duplicates. Just reply to the relevant mailinglist.
	hvdkooij@...derkooij.org		http://hvdkooij.xs4all.nl/
		Don't meddle in the affairs of magicians,
		for they are subtle and quick to anger.