[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041102204346.GA30333@immunix.com>
From: jesse at immunix.com (jesse michael)
Subject: OT-POLITICAL: (Was: www.georgewbush.com)
On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 08:12:46PM +0100, yossarian wrote:
> Interesting - who said that DMCA or the Communications Decency Act or the
> Patriot Act were tech friendly? These three are at best pro-certain
> unmentionable tech companies, but basically against the free flow of
> information, which many consider a condition sin qua non for tech
> development. Probably news.com wants to rally the vote of the techies for
> Bush.... If they buy that, they truly deserve another tech-slump, which
> started if memory serves me right, round the time GWB got an election...
according to the methodology they used to calculate this, you had to vote
_against_ the dmca, cda, or patriot act in order to gain "tech friendly"
points.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041102/252621ae/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists