[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <200411041924.iA4JOr9D006350@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
From: Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu (Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu)
Subject: New Remote Windows Exploit (MS04-029)
On Thu, 04 Nov 2004 15:33:38 -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa said:
> Does anyone still have /tmp without noexec ?
>
> /dev/sda2 on /tmp type ext3 (rw,noexec,nodev,nosuid)
1) A lot of people have a "one partition for everything" configuration,
as that's what their distro did at the time they first installed it. This
makes it hard to mount /tmp with different options, and a lot of people don't
feel like doing a complete re-install to repartition.
2) An amazing amount of stuff assumes that /tmp has 'exec' - at
least for a while, 'rpmbuild' of a Redhat Perl would die because it
build into a directory on /tmp, and then tried to run a binary out
of that just-built tree - workaround was to feed rpm a '%_tmpdir ='
pointing elsewhere. Dell's microcode installer hits the same issue,
as did at least some OpenOffice builds.
So if you do it, be prepared to get bit, and have to do a
'mount -o remount,exec /tmp' once in a while...
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 226 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041104/bd38a013/attachment.bin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists