[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041104202730.GH6271@bethel.edu>
From: b-nordquist at bethel.edu (Brent J. Nordquist)
Subject: New Remote Windows Exploit (MS04-029)
On Thu, Nov 04, 2004 at 03:33:38PM -0200, Rodrigo Barbosa wrote:
> Does anyone still have /tmp without noexec ?
>
> /dev/sda2 on /tmp type ext3 (rw,noexec,nodev,nosuid)
$ /lib/ld-linux.so.2 /tmp/anexe
(or in this case)
$ perl /tmp/hi
Those are just two off the top of my head; I've read of enough others
to wonder whether noexec /tmp really buys you much, other than tripping
up virus and trojan-horse writers that haven't considered that case
and planned for it (e.g. `pwd`/.hi instead of /tmp/hi).
--
Brent J. Nordquist <b-nordquist@...hel.edu> N0BJN
Other contact information: http://kepler.its.bethel.edu/~bjn/contact.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists