lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20041112081148.IOUE27180.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@poof>
From: poof at fansubber.com (Poof)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

Well, question here...

Why is it that Microsoft's code has less quality even though all code that's
written is instantly audited? (Each line of code is checked before it's
'passed' in to the code tree.)

I just don't understand... Why is it that a software product that a company
has been working on. And has so many precautions when writing... End up
sub-quality? While the 'flame of the month' browser is the most secure thing
since Swiss cheese?

I guess I'll just never understand.

~

> 
> ... because as soon as you hit 50% marketshare, the quality of the code
> which has been written and distributed instantaneously and magically
> drops and order of magnitude ...
> 
> </sarcasm>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ