[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFF636D3CB.15B2D3EA-ON80256F4A.003B16CF-80256F4A.003B38D6@csplc.com>
From: Colin.Scott at csplc.com (Colin.Scott@...lc.com)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox
Oh yeah, I've got 14,000 Windows 2000 machines to update to windows XP SP2,
hang on wheres that CD?
So thanks for your infinate wisdom there Rafel.
Colin.
"Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider" <theinsider@....n To et.il> <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com> Sent by: cc full-disclosure-a dmin@...ts.netsys Subject .com Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox 12/11/2004 06:44
That is incorrect, there is a fix --> SP2.
Users should use the latest updated system, meaning if there is an SP2,
they
should install it.
Rafel Ivgi, The-Insider
Security Consultant
Malicious Code Research Center (MCRC)
Finjan Software LTD
E-mail: rivgi@...jan.com
---------------------------------
Prevention is the best cure!
----- Original Message -----
From: "Martin Mkrtchian" <dotsecure@...il.com>
To: "Todd Towles" <toddtowles@...okshires.com>
Cc: "Mailing List - Full-Disclosure" <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>;
<ring-of-fire@...oogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, November 12, 2004 3:03 AM
Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] IE is just as safe as FireFox
> They should've at least released that statement after they fixed the
> IE FRAME vulnerability. 0 day exploit is in the wild and no fix for
> it, yet they claim its secure enough.
>
> If the programmers are as smart as the company press releasers, I can
> see? why I.E. still sux.
>
>
> Martin
>
>
> On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:59:20 -0600, Todd Towles
> <toddtowles@...okshires.com> wrote:
>> Microsoft's security and mangement product manager (Ben English)
says...
>>
>> At a security roundtable discussion in Sydney on Thursday, Ben English,
>> Microsoft's security and management product manager, told attendees
that
>> IE undergoes "rigorous code reviews" and is no less secure than any
>> other browser.
>>
>> "Because IE is ubiquitous, you hear a lot more about it, but I don't
>> think that Internet Explorer is any less secure than any other browser
>> out there," English said.
>>
>> http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_
>> 3-5448719.html?part=dht&tag=ntop&tag=nl.e433
>>
>> Can anyone say IFRAME? Lol
>>
>> -Todd
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
>> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
**************************************************************************************
This e-mail is confidential and may contain privileged information. If you are not the addressee or if you have received the e-mail in error, it may
be unlawful for you to read, copy, distribute, disclose or otherwise use the
information which it contains. Under these circumstances, please notify
us immediately by returning this mail to 'mailerror@...lc.com' and deleting
this e-mail from your system.
Any views expressed by an individual within this e-mail do not necessarily
reflect the views of Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries. Cadbury
Schweppes Plc will not be bound by any agreement entered into as a result
of this email, unless its intention is clearly evidenced in the body of the email.
Whilst we have taken reasonable steps to ensure that this e-mail and
attachments are free from viruses, recipients are advised to subject this mail
to their own virus checking, in keeping with good computing practice. Please
note that email received by Cadbury Schweppes Plc or its subsidiaries may be
monitored in accordance with the prevailing law in the United Kingdom.
**************************************************************************************
Powered by blists - more mailing lists