full-disclosure - Re: Unofficial Internet Explorer FRAME/IFRAME fix

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4194E334.3070108@cherryware.de>
From: tr-lists at cherryware.de (Thomas Rogg)
Subject: Re: Unofficial Internet Explorer FRAME/IFRAME
 fix

Hello Raoul,

>> But I do not believe that $2,50 is a ridiciously high amount, is it?
>
>
> But I do not believe that pay $0, get Firefox and do not worry about 
> next (and unpatched previous) IE issues is worse decision :)

Yeah, sure. But there are always other programs that use the Internet 
Explorer engine to display their HTML pages. See the website for the 
other reasons (http://www.cherryware.de/framefix/).

>
> Seems that your patch is merely replacing original MSHTML.DLL with one 
> extracted from XP SP2, is it?

Have you looked at the website (http://www.cherryware.de/framefix/)? 
This is not the case and I'm sure Microsoft wouldn't like that at all. 
Also, I'm sure there would be problems when trying that with 2000.

FYI, the patch does just-in-time patching. It installs a system-wide 
callback which is called whenever a module is loaed. When the mshtml 
module loads, the patch is inserted into the correct place, by replacing 
5 bytes of code with a CALL to the patch code, which is inserted in a 
block created by VirtualAlloc with execute flags.

BTW, to show that the program isn't scam, as some people seem to think, 
I have wrote down 25 one-time reference IDs on the website to allow 25 
people to download and try the patch.

That's all.

-- Thomas