lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <261333f104111117035519ee9b@mail.gmail.com>
From: dotsecure at gmail.com (Martin Mkrtchian)
Subject: IE is just as safe as FireFox

They should've at least released that statement after they fixed the
IE FRAME vulnerability. 0 day exploit is in the wild and no fix for
it, yet they claim its secure enough.

If the programmers are as smart as the company press releasers, I can
see  why I.E. still sux.


Martin


On Thu, 11 Nov 2004 15:59:20 -0600, Todd Towles
<toddtowles@...okshires.com> wrote:
> Microsoft's security and mangement product manager (Ben English) says...
> 
> At a security roundtable discussion in Sydney on Thursday, Ben English,
> Microsoft's security and management product manager, told attendees that
> IE undergoes "rigorous code reviews" and is no less secure than any
> other browser.
> 
> "Because IE is ubiquitous, you hear a lot more about it, but I don't
> think that Internet Explorer is any less secure than any other browser
> out there," English said.
> 
> http://news.com.com/Microsoft+says+Firefox+not+a+threat+to+IE/2100-1032_
> 3-5448719.html?part=dht&tag=ntop&tag=nl.e433
> 
> Can anyone say IFRAME? Lol
> 
> -Todd
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ