full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <111320040629.5804.4195A9B0000CD516000016AC22007511509B9C0704059D0E03@comcast.net>
From: marklist at comcast.net (marklist@...cast.net)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

> 
> 
> marklist@...cast.net wrote:
> > Sorry list, I just couldn't resist......
> 
> I couldn't either :-(
> 
> > 
> > *Electoral votes vs. Population [1]
> > 
> > State    Population Votes  Votes / M pop.
> > -----------------------------------------
> > Alaska      648,818   3        4.624
> > Wyoming     501,242   3        5.985
> > Texas    22,118,509  34        1.537
> > ....
> > 
> > I guess you must have missed that day in elementary 
> > school when they covered this.  Pretty simple huh???
> > 
> > Are you happy that a Wyoming voter has 3.89 times the 
> > political power you do????
> > 
> > Next time get your facts together before you post.
> > 
> > -Shub
> > 
> > [1] http://www.fairvote.org/e_college/popandvotes.htm
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> Mark??
> 
> It is clear to me that you do not understand the electoral college and 
> how it is designed. The system is designed to ensure that the people 
> that live in the US have equal representation. If Wyoming had one person 
> living in it there would be three electoral votes representing that 
> person, for good reason.
> 
> Each state is given two electoral college votes in the senate and one 
> for each congress person representing the people based on population.
> 
> Before you continue to rant on about representation and how much a vote 
> is worth I suggest you read a little about how the system works. Once 
> you have finished reading up on the topic and the issues around a simple 
> majority rules society I would be interested in hearing your thoughts.
> 
> http://www.fec.gov/pages/ecmenu2.htm
> 
> and get the book "Securing Democracy : Why We Have an Electoral College"
> ISBN: 188292665X
> 
> Regards,
> Jason


Your link did not tell me anything I didn't know already.  Many
people, including myself believe that the electoral system is flawed and 
outdated.  If you believe otherwise, great keep your opinion, but don't 
tell me that I don't understand how the system works.   The system was
designed with "Majority rules" in mind, they just didn't have the resources
to implement it properly.

IT IS A FACT that people's votes count more or less depending on what
state they live in.

Anyway... I'm sick of this thread already, so if you want to reply, do it 
directly and save the rest of the readers from this crap.

Oh yeah, Mr. null@...d.com: (from ozemail.net)

> Received: from smta09.mail.ozemail.net ([203.103.165.130])
>           by rwcrmxc21.comcast.net (rwcrmxc21) with ESMTP
>           id <20041113041152r21000uih2e>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 04:11:52 +0000
> X-Originating-IP: [203.103.165.130]
> Received: from p41700 ([203.102.171.125]) by smta09.mail.ozemail.net
>           with ESMTP
>           id <20041113041151.OGSQ15593.smta09.mail.ozemail.net@...700>
>           for <marklist@...cast.net>; Sat, 13 Nov 2004 04:11:51 +0000
> Subject: Will you lot PISS OFF?
>
> You have sent the attached unsolicited e-mail to an otherwise GOOD security 
> email list.
> 
> 
> 
> NO-ONE outside AMERICA gives a bloody SHIT about the American election crap! 
> Keep it OFF LIST!

> FUCK THE HELL OFF!

> OH and in case you twits DONT get it, this reply WASNT to the list! So many 
> so-called experts cannot even figure THAT out! TWITS!

Get a life dude.   Either use a valid address or STFU.  No one listens to anyone
hiding behind a false address.

-Shub