full-disclosure - [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1100525677.4198b06d63e85@webmail.broadpark.no>
From: jbernts at broadpark.no (jbernts@...adpark.no)
Subject: [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox

Quoting Raoul Nakhmanson-Kulish <raoul@...orsoft.com>:

> Hello, Curt Purdy!
> 
> > Upgrade W2K to XP?  I call that a downgrade! I won't allow XP (sp2 or not)
> > on my network.
> Agreed, I feel 2K to be more reliable than XP too. But mainly this is 
> only my feeling, could you explain and prove it by more solid arguments 
> than feelings?
> 
> -- 

Windows 2K is much easier to reinstall than Windows XP, which is pretty locked
down, and less picky on the amount of hardware that is added to the PC/Server.

- Jostein