full-disclosure - OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87wtwnrmtl.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
From: fw at deneb.enyo.de (Florian Weimer)
Subject: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

* Paul Schmehl:

> --On Monday, November 15, 2004 05:18:16 PM +0100 Florian Weimer 
> <fw@...eb.enyo.de> wrote:
>>
>> The problem isn't so much the weighting (it's even more extreme in the
>> senate), but the "the winner gets it all" principle adopted in most
>> states.  This means that both election campaigns do not care a bit
>> about states like Texas where a ten percent swing in one direction or
>> the other simply has no net result.
>
> <http://www.sbe.state.va.us/Election/Electoral_College.htm>
> <http://www.usconstitution.net/consttop_elec.html>
> <http://www.spies.com/Forums/showthread.php?threadid=404>

And what's your point?