full-disclosure - FW: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: jpspam at adelphia.net (jpspam@...lphia.net)
Subject: FW: OT: U.S. 2004 Election Fraud.

Did you even bother to look at the "CANVASS REPORT" link on the page you reference?  Or would you rather stupidly believe in a conspiracy theory rather than do a little thinking?  Looking at the full report, and you can clearly see why there were more "ballots" cast then there were registered voters.

Take "WOODMERE VIL" that you list below.  558 registered voters.  8854 "ballots" cast.  But what was the actual vote count for the presidential race?  40 total votes for Bush, 258 total votes for Kerry.  If you do the math and add up *all* of the votes in *all* 50 issues which Woodmere voted on, then you get a total of 8854 (+/- 1%, I didn't spend too much time).  So rather than someone "screwing up the vote process", you're just looking at a small district that counts each issue as a separate ballot.

Gee, ya think maybe this really does have nothing to do with security, but is instead just some pipe dream of the disenfranchised?

-jps

At 03:09 PM 11/15/2004, Geo. wrote:
>If you guys are serious about finding out how and who is screwing up the
>voting process I suggest you start here (cuyahoga county ohio)
>
>http://www.boe.cuyahogacounty.us/boe/results/currentresults1.htm
>
>a quick look at how the total votes outnumber the registered voters for
>
>ORANGE CSD
>WOODMERE VIL
>HIGHLAND HILLS VIL
>BEDFORD HEIGHTS
>FAIRVIEW PARK
>BEDFORD CSD
>BAY VILLAGE
>BEDFORD
>WARRENSVILLE HEIGHTS
>OAKWOOD VIL
>
>and about a dozen others should get you going.
>
>Geo. (there, now you have some real data to talk about)