full-disclosure - question regarding CAN-2004-0930

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <f6ed809104111616383fcd5f09@mail.gmail.com>
From: upbupb at gmail.com (upb)
Subject: question regarding CAN-2004-0930

Blah, the difference is that the linux shell does * expansion i think.

> hm, i still don't get it: the daemon has to answer to "dir" too, doesn't
> he? the sole reason that "ls is a unix utility" does not make sense in
> this context.