full-disclosure - question regarding CAN-2004-0930

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: rob.kleingunnewiek at gmail.com (Rob klein Gunnewiek)
Subject: question regarding CAN-2004-0930

On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 11:34:59 -0500, Castigliola, Angelo
<acastigliola@...mprovident.com> wrote:
> 
> The reason is that when you run the "dir" command Samba does the
> processing and chokes. When you try the latter command "ls" Linux\Unix
> processes the command and has no problems.
> 

Not completely so. Issuing the command using the client causes that
the wildcards are sent to the server where globbing is handled..
there's also where the error occurs. When you mount it first and you
do the 'ls' command, your local BASH (not 'ls') handles the globbing
(wildcards) so it doesn't even arrive at the smb server.

-- 
Rob klein Gunnewiek