full-disclosure - Why is IRC still around?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

From: richard at tccnet.co.uk (Richard Stevens)
Subject: Why is IRC still around?

In the last year or two of subscribing to FD, that is the single most idiotic statement I have ever read.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com on behalf of Danny 
	Sent: Fri 19/11/2004 17:40 
	To: Mailing List - Full-Disclosure 
	Cc: 
	Subject: [Full-Disclosure] Why is IRC still around?
	
	

	Well, it sure does help the anti-virus (anti-malware) and security
	consulting business, but besides that... is it not safe to say that:
	
	1) A hell of a lot of viruses/worms/trojans use IRC to wreck further havoc?
	2) A considerable amount of "script kiddies" originate and grow through IRC?
	3) A wee bit of software piracy occurs?
	4) That many organized DoS attacks through PC zombies are initiated through IRC?
	5) The anonymity of the whole thing helps to foster all the illegal
	and malicious activity that occurs?
	The list goes on and on...
	
	Sorry to offend those that use IRC legitimately (LOL - find something
	else to chat with your buddies), but why the hell are we not pushing
	to sunset IRC?
	
	What would IT be like today without IRC (or the like)? Am I narrow
	minded to say that it would be a much safer place?
	
	...D
	
	_______________________________________________
	Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
	Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html