full-disclosure - [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <419E6894.7050106@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (bkfsec)
Subject: [in] Re: IE is just as safe as FireFox

Andrew Farmer wrote:

>
> In fact, I'm not so sure it's even a component of Nautilus. Is this a 
> recent change?

Nope - it depends on how you install Nautilus, though.  I know that on a 
number of RH systems I've had to configure lately, Mozilla is a 
dependancy (not firefox) because Nautilus seems to use it. (at least in 
RH - my recollection of whether it's available as a dependancy in the 
Nautilus source code is hazy, it's been a long time since I've compiled 
GNOME and it will most likely be an even longer time before I do it again.)

             -Barry