full-disclosure - Re: Why is IRC still around? (n3td3v is a troll)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b6ee93104112104561ec78cdc@mail.gmail.com>
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Re: Why is IRC still around? (n3td3v is a troll)

On Sun, 21 Nov 2004 05:00:27 +0000 (GMT), Steve R
<steve_r125@...oo.co.uk> wrote:
> First you say that *you* would even close IRC channels
> and then you state that "this idea would never work."

Yes, there is a difference between closing IRC channels and banning
IRC from the internet, as the previous author on the previous thread
was suggesting.

Yes, I still think its impossible to ban the IRC protocol from the
internet, this is a different thing from closing down known high
profile hacker sites which promote the the malicious hacker scene,
along with any IRC channels connected with malicious hackers.

Thanks for the insults as well. Very intelligent of you.

n3td3v
http://www.geocities.com/n3td3v