full-disclosure - Re: Why is IRC still around?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20041122173230.44151.qmail@web25205.mail.ukl.yahoo.com>
From: steve_r125 at yahoo.co.uk (Steve R)
Subject: Re: Why is IRC still around?

It's always the assumptive idiots who get it wrong.
*big sigh*
FYI "Poof" (says it all really) I *did not* get the
quote from bash.org, nor do I use IRC/IM. I was sent
it by a friend in an email quite a while ago...
Therefore your sigh and your question were not needed
muppet.

 --- Poof <poof@...subber.com> wrote: 
> Now... Here is the question...
> 
> Which is worse... Sitting on IRC and making those
> comments... Or browsing
> bash.org to view them.
> 
> *sigh*
> 
> ~ 
> > IRC is still around because it does one thing.
> > It proves that Einstein was right about stupidity:
> it
> > is infinite.
> > 
> > [frank] can you help me install GTA3?
> > [knightmare] first, shut down all programs you
> aren't
> > using
> > frank has quit IRC. (Quit)
> > [knightmare] ...
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter:
> http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>  

___________________________________________________________ 
Win a castle for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
http://uk.messenger.yahoo.com