full-disclosure - Why is IRC still around?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4b6ee93104112307122ac641cb@mail.gmail.com>
From: xploitable at gmail.com (n3td3v)
Subject: Why is IRC still around?

On Mon, 22 Nov 2004 17:14:09 -0600, vord <vordhosbn@...il.com> wrote:
> [flame response] firstly, n3td3v is only mad because i happened to ban
> him from #hackphreak ... which is incidentally the current home of
> former/current "members" of [where to begin?] rhino9, w00w00 ... and
> of course, people who're currently employed at CA/ISS/M$/FS/SIDC. the
> list goes on. are we script kiddies or do we maybe like to do more
> than talk about computers all day? you be the judge. anyway, that has
> nothing to do with this list or this discussion and im sure we'd all
> benefit from you, and morons like rap1st, keeping their mouths
> shut.[/flame response]

You never *banned* me from anywhere. You banned a host mask I was
using. I'm still on the channel with an open proxy and different
nickname. Remind the others why you banned me, yeah you banned me
because I was making fun of how lame you all are, and how none of you
can answer simple questions, which don't even need a technical
response, a first year uni student could answer.

All you guys do on the channel is talk about pimps and whores and
other *general chat* stuff. Nothing related to security or hacking is
discussed (and if it is, its in very general terms) that would merit
the name *hackphreak*.

You give IRC and real hackers and phreakers a bad name.