full-disclosure - University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In Florida

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41A4B0A1.3020904@sdf.lonestar.org>
From: bkfsec at sdf.lonestar.org (bkfsec)
Subject: University Researchers Challenge Bush Win In
 Florida

Thomas Sutpen wrote:

>Any sort of impartiality and vested interest in the actual security of
>the whole process that you might have claimed to had was pissed away
>in your very first post on the subject.  The one where you came out
>waving the Kerry flag.  Remember?
>
>It is my observation that your thinly veiled concern for the process
>is merely out of self-interest, if not sour grapes.  Your fixation and
>continued posting on the subject does nothing to add to your
>credibility.  And further, it helps perpetuate the stereotype that
>liberals are wackos, nut-jobs, conspiracy theorists, and underground
>members of the peoples' tin-foil hat militia.
>
>At least your previous email wasn't one of your six-page, vaguely
>coherent, pedantic and almost meaningless rants that make you sound
>stoned.
>
>Shut up about it, already.
>
>  
>
So anyone who is concerned about the system and has shown that they 
aren't on your side of the political fence should have their opinion 
sumarily tossed out?

Well, since you so clearly have shown your own allegiance, wouldn't the 
case be the same for you?  Thanks for the opening. 

Everyone, please disregard Thomas' opinions - he's shown himself to not 
be impartial.

             -Barry