full-disclosure - Re: FIREFOX flaws: nested array sort() loop Stack overflow exception

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41A6194E.9000801@linuxbox.org>
From: ge at linuxbox.org (Gadi Evron)
Subject: Re: FIREFOX flaws: nested array sort() loop Stack overflow exception

> I'd have loved to CC mozilla about this, but I didn't have the time to do the crash course "how to write a bug report" and go through all that bugzilla crap.

So instead you unleash it upon kiddie and spammer world? That's lovely.

Next you will come by again and say: "I'm still hoping I get to see the
guy who wrote those MyDoom worms in court, he violated the GPL and
spread millions(?) of copies of my (modified) source)."

So, you release it like you did and, expect what?

Some people are advocates of this or that disclosure mechanism, and
believe they are right. I can bite.
You just say: "I'm so cool. I will release this, get a ton of attention
and then say 'hey! They violated GPL! How dare they?!'"

Full disclosure. Responsible disclosure (according to whoever).
Non-disclosure. Fine. What are you doing?

	Gadi.