full-disclosure - If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all start doing it?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <41AF5CD3.5020801@gmail.com>
From: krispykringle at gmail.com (KrispyKringle)
Subject: If Lycos can attack spammer sites, can we all
 start doing it?

Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu wrote:
> That's a minor factual detail, and we care somewhere between diddly and squat
> regarding the facts of the case. ;)

I didn't know they were based in Germany.

> The US government of late has shown little moral or ethical qualms about
> imposing its law and morality on people and actions in other sovereign states,
> while reserving its right to pick-and-choose regarding its own behavior.
> 
> Remember, we're the bunch that detained a lot of people for things they did
> in their own country to repel an invading army (namely, us), and then stuffed
> them into Guantanamo Bay so that we wouldn't have to actually accord them
> their Geneva Convention rights as prisoners-of-war.  We've also seen fit to
> skip the whole idea of "habeas corpus" for our *own* citizens (see "Hamdi v.
> Rumsfeld" and "Rumsfeld v. Padilla") and even the concept that you should be
> allowed to know what law you're violating (see "Gilmore v. Ashcroft").
> 
> So be afraid. Be very afraid....
> 
> (OK, you can have the soapbox back now... ;)

Actually, many countries, I believe, recognize the right of citizens to
sue foreign entities, who's in-country assets can then be seized.

But yeah, don't talk to me about Guantanamo. Today I happen to be
wearing my nice anti-Bush t-shirt ;)