lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <OFD85DAA96.6C220B02-ON86256F62.004FA2EB-86256F62.004FED51@kohls.com>
From: Bart.Lansing at kohls.com (Bart.Lansing@...ls.com)
Subject: I'm calling for LycosEU heads and team to 	resign or
 be sacked


full-disclosure-admin@...ts.netsys.com wrote on 12/03/2004 07:50:36 PM:

> > And if the spammers don't like my packets being sent to their system,
> > all they have to do is send me a polite e-mail asking to be removed
> > from my flood-list. It is really quite simple!
> 
> Wow.  Obviously you are not responsible for authorizing payment to 
transit
> providers and have no idea how much bandwidth actually might cost an
> organization on a perMonth/perMeg basis.  This would have never had any
> SERIOUS effect on backbone providers but many of their customers who 
don't
> even KNOW they  have someone generating spam from their network would
> unfortunately see a great deal of money lost.
> 
> Why don't you go physically assault a spammer.  Do you physically 
assault
> door-to-door solicitors or do you have a sign on your front porch.

I see...now someone has decided that hyperbole is just what we need...by 
all means let's equate trying to bog a spammer's systems down with 
physical assault.  You can go away now.
> 
> Obviously spam costs all of us $ in some form or another but incurring
> rapidly generated expenses for non-responsible parties to me seems a bit
> cruel.  Do you assault the mailman for delivering junkmail that 
companies
> actually pay the USPS to deliver?

See above reference to going away...or else find coherent and valid 
analogies...thanks for playing.
> 
> /m
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bob Smith" <tatercrispies@...il.com>
> To: <full-disclosure@...ts.netsys.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 03, 2004 5:11 PM
> Subject: Re: [Full-Disclosure] I'm calling for LycosEU heads and team to
> resign or be sacked
> 
> 
> > > I think heads should roll over this. I think its the worst act a
> corporation has ever undertaken in the history of the internet.
> >
> > So speaketh n3td3v, prohpet, visionary, lord and leader of Full
> Disclosure.
> >
> > The Internet has always been about vigilante justice. Aside from
> > exceptionally egregious cases of wrongdoing, like sexually explicit
> > material with children, fraud, or flagrant piracy, the Internet exists
> > and operates beyond the boundaries of any one nation's laws. It is up
> > to the people to self regulate.
> >
> > We have tried politely reasoning with spammers, we have tried ignoring
> > spammers, we have tried _suing_ spammers. We've leisurely worked our
> > way down the tree and are well past any sort of rational recourse. Now
> > people are willing to resort to brute retaliation.
> >
> > When you sign on to the Internet, you accept this implicitly, to some
> > degree or another.  If you screw up, people will blackhole you, flood
> > you, or isolate you. Spammers have been  lapping us in the face for
> > too long, and now the Internet reacts and fights back.
> >
> > Everyone who downloaded that screensaver did so intentionally, this
> > wasn't a trojan operating behind the scenes. The participants were
> > willing combatants. The engine for the battle happened to come from
> > Lycos this time, but there have been other efforts in the past as
> > well.
> >
> > And if the spammers don't like my packets being sent to their system,
> > all they have to do is send me a polite e-mail asking to be removed
> > from my flood-list. It is really quite simple!
> >
> > -Taters
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> > Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: 
This is a transmission from Kohl's Department Stores, Inc.
and may contain information which is confidential and proprietary.
If you are not the addressee, any disclosure, copying or distribution or use of the contents of this message is expressly prohibited.
If you have received this transmission in error, please destroy it and notify us immediately at 262-703-7000.

CAUTION:
Internet and e-mail communications are Kohl's property and Kohl's reserves the right to retrieve and read any message created, sent and received.  Kohl's reserves the right to monitor messages by authorized Kohl's Associates at any time
without any further consent.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041206/043fbc81/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ