lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
From: contact_jamie_fisher at yahoo.co.uk (jamie fisher)
Subject: GPRS/IP-session from Nokia/Symbian
	mobilephonestays up

Dude,
 
What you see is a "feature" of the GPRS system and really up to the operators to control.
 
It works like this:
 
In a simplified form: in GPRS the mobile phone authenticates to the mobile network via SGSN which gets its response from the HLR/VLR.  The SGSN then sets up the PDP context between the MS (mobile) and the SGSN - the GGSN is informed of the context which allows it to request an IP for the mobile.  Once this is complete, traffic in the form of PDUs can then traverse the network from the MS to the GGSN.  TCP/IP traffic is then encapuslated within the PDUs.
 
In the standard case traffic flow can be initiated by the MS or by the GGSN depending on the traffic direction.  In the standards, traffic can flow from MS to MS via the GGSN or from the MS to GGSN or from the GGSN to the MS.  It is up to the operator to filter the traffic.  Originally it was envisaged that people would want to send packets from MS to MS, from the Internet to the MS and from the MS to the Internet.  It is up to the operator to control that as they see fit.  For MS to MS traffic flow the PDUs must traverse through the GGSN as the MSs may be using different SGSNs.  (Normally in different geographic locations)
 
>From memory the PDP context can have a no-activity timeout or the network can initiate "call tear-down" from the MS (by hanging up) or by the GGSN.  It is up to the operator as to if then enable the timeout and what duration is set.
 
If there is traffic on the PDP context then the context will stay up - think of it like PPP on demand dialing.
 
The operators DHCP server leases out an address; users can not 'steal' a DHCP lease - as there are limits on how many IPs a MS can get.  The limits are both hardware/software and set by the operator.
 

Second point, IPv6 is becomming available on vendor equipment as time goes by.  It is in the standards - see 3GPP - but because of legacy equipment operators are slow to take it up hence the lack of IPv6 implementation on mobile networks.  When you have 10,000s of MS out there that do not support IPv6 you really cannot "turn it on" over night.

"Juliao Duartenn (Oblog-Direccao)" <juliao.duartenn@...og.pt> wrote:
As stated by the original poster, costs are definitely not the only issue here.

One of the main abuse forms for this is depleting the entire provider GPRS IP range. Even though IPv6 is now almost 10 years old, mobile carriers still chose to implement IP over GPRS using IPv4.

This, of course, leaves them open to address depletion.

And now, will they change?

Juli?o

> > Howdy,
> >
> > I think this is part of the reason why some carriers, such 
> as T-Mobile,
> > use RFC1918 addresses instead of publically routable IPs.
> 
> Not here in the Netherlands :-)
> 
> inetnum: 194.229.200.0 - 194.229.207.255
> netname: T-MOBILE-NL
> descr: t-mobile.nl
> country: NL
> admin-c: RM1746-RIPE
> tech-c: RM1746-RIPE
> status: ASSIGNED PA
> mnt-by: NLNET-MNT
> changed: bartk@...uu.net 20030801
> source: RIPE
> 
> I get an IP-address out of this range on my phone.
> 
> --
> Marco
> 
> 
> 
> > They do allow
> > you to specifically request real addresses if you need it 
> for something
> > like IPSec too. Of course, this is kind of a moot point 
> when they have
> > unlimited data plans in the US.
> >
> > William Reading
> >
> > Marco Davids (Prive) wrote:
> >
> > >Hi,
> > >
> > >For what it is worth:
> > >
> > >When my Nokia 6600 (Symbian V7.0s) mobile phone was 
> connected to the
> > >Internet and an imap-server for some tests the other day, 
> I decided to
> > >run a ping to the phone's IP-address (in fact I did an 
> nmap -O to the
> > >phone first, but that didn't work).
> > >
> > >After the mail was retrieved I closed the 
> email-application on the phone.
> > >Normally the GPRS-session is terminated in such a case. 
> But not this time,
> > >while the pings went on. This time I had to force the 
> session to go down,
> > >which is an option on the phone, luckily. I just never 
> used it before :-)
> > >
> > >Later on I tried an SSH-session with the Mocha Telnet 
> application from my
> > >phone. Same behaviour. After I closed the SSH-application 
> and as the
> > >pings went on the (expensive) GPRS-session did not terminate as it
> > >normally does when there is no incoming icmp traffic. When 
> I finished
> > >the external pings to the phone, the GPRS-session closed by itself.
> > >
> > >I tried again, this time with a larger packet-size, but 
> that did not work.
> > >
> > >Then I tried a flood-ping and that did work. The 
> GPRS-session stayed up
> > >and the GRPS-counters increased dramatically! By this time 
> my little
> > >experiments where getting rather pricey for me.
> > >
> > >Conclusion: Even after the last application that uses IP 
> on the phone is
> > >closed, the GPRS-session stays up as long as there is incoming
> > >(icmp)traffic. I am not sure what to think of this, but this seems
> > >rather undesirable to me. Do other phones also 'suffer' form this
> > >behaviour?
> > >
> > >This 'feature' can be abused. One could easily be lead to 
> believe that the
> > >GPRS-session is over, while in reality it is not.
> > >
> > >I did a quick ping-scan on the IP-range that my phone was in and
> > >discovered 355 active, 'pingable', IP-addresses out of 
> 2048. I figured it
> > >be better not to start flood-pinging all of them them, but 
> I couldn't help
> > >thinking what would happen if some punk did: many phone's 
> online would
> > >probably stay online, depending on the number of phone 
> models that show
> > >the same behaviour. That would not only generate costs to 
> their owners,
> > >but would probaly also exhaust available IP-addresses for new
> > >connections, resulting in some kind of DoS to the GPRS IP-service.
> > >
> > >Greetings,
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
> 

_______________________________________________
Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html

		
---------------------------------
Win a castle  for NYE with your mates and Yahoo! Messenger 
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/attachments/20041213/716fd1f8/attachment.html

Powered by blists - more mailing lists