full-disclosure - To anybody who's offended by my disclosure policy-GET THIS GUYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <b7bc1b1f0412141259293fb64@mail.gmail.com>
From: uberguidoz at gmail.com (GuidoZ)
Subject: To anybody who's offended by my disclosure
	policy-GET THIS GUYS

> You should add some "the opinions expressed in the email message are not
> necessarily those of my employer" or the like.. I doubt Finjan needs the
> bad publicity among the security community of one of their researchers
> saying this kind of behaviour is "COOL".

Highly agree. To be honest, I was a bit taken aback to see where the
email came from. I realize that you likely do not represent Finjan
software as a whole, however it will be seen that way by some. If
you're going to post such opinionated posts, then I advise you get a
web based account just for that purpose. Otherwise it looks like
you're trying to use your title/job as a reason for people to listen
to you - hence why it could look very bad for Finjan Software. They
have good products and don't need the negative publicity.

--
Peace. ~G


On Sun, 28 Nov 2004 17:06:56 +0200, Gadi Evron <ge@...uxbox.org> wrote:
> Hi Rafel. 'Sup?
> 
> > What i am saying is, it is now who codes the software, it is how you do.
> > (if i was not in a job working frame, i would publishing things that will
> > cause you all to say its shit)
> > FireFox team claimed its an old bug.bla bla bla.and has no problem and no
> > security risk...bla bla bla... and didn't fix it after 4 month...
> > Just like MS when they are not even commercial, than what they are? on the
> > way to making money...to be the second size'd market share browser.
> 
> What does Mozilla and MS have to do with the guy? Yes, he seems like a
> nice guy who knows what he is doing.. but that's where it ends.
> 
> He might do things differently usually, or in the future, but he didn't
> in this case, at least as far as I see it.
> 
> He did not just release, hold back or notify the vendor - he just sends
> things out with claims of semi-world-domination and
> "you'll-pay-for-ignoring-me" - and then.. blames people for braking GPL
> when they mis-use his "creations" or "findings" if you prefer.
> 
> Give me a break.
> 
> I think both him and myself now reached an understanding of what the
> other guy was trying to say.
> 
> Your claims of "I WOULD HAVE RELEASED IF I DIDN'T WORK HERE" sound just
> as vain. Release or be quiet.
> Nobody's perfect - not MS or Mozilla. Let's leave the MS sucks debate to
> other threads.
> 
> > GO SKYLINED!
> 
> GO SKYLINED!
> 
> Or in other words, Rafel: "I am working for a company now, so I can go
> out and act like an idiot." :)
> 
> You should add some "the opinions expressed in the email message are not
> necessarily those of my employer" or the like.. I doubt Finjan needs the
> bad publicity among the security community of one of their researchers
> saying this kind of behaviour is "COOL".
> 
>         Gadi.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Full-Disclosure - We believe in it.
> Charter: http://lists.netsys.com/full-disclosure-charter.html
>